Archive for September, 2006

Sept 11 and Gay Bashing

Monday, September 11th, 2006

Don’t I just ever tire of introducing gay & lesbian politics into just about everything?

NO & NEVER!

I just finished watching the DVD of United Flight 93 (on Sept 11 nonetheless, but I did not intend that), and what struck me the most out of this movie* is how passengers and hijackers alike prayed to their respective Gods during their dark times. The former perhaps to justify their counter-attack on the hijackers who they intended to kill, and the latter to justify their suicidal and murderous desires to crash the plane and kill all the passengers (preferably somewhere symbolic of American life).

This only shows how faith/religion, is customizable. Think of any plot (i.e. discriminate gay people, justify sex with children, prohibit a woman’s right to abortion etc), and you will surely find something in your religion to justify your convictions and the (hateful) actions that you will use to support them.

How could it be that god can be on both sides of the fence (passengers and hijackers) when the objectives of the competing parties were opposites of each other, negating each other actually?

It is easy to say that God was with the passengers, but this is downplaying the historic, cultural, and sociological aspects/factors/reasons that brought the 4 men into United Flight 73 to begin with. Everyone on board knew they were doing the right (i.e. god-approved) action. How do you explain this.

Perhaps god was with no one, except those who had love — and only love — in their hearts. Not hate. Not faith. Not prayers.

I look at straight people now, and regardless of how open-minded, liberal, gay-friendly they espouse themselves to be — if they get God on their side to defend reservations or negative opinions (even if they are limited or mild) about gay life (marriage, structure, stability, rights etc), to me they are nothing but garden-variety customizable-religion junkies. And oh how I wish that I could’ve bought plane tickets for them all!

Same-Sex Relationships are Unstable: Fact or Fiction?

Saturday, September 9th, 2006

FICTION. Purely. In fact, it doesn’t only belong on the Fiction Shelf, it belongs to the section where the cat in the hat carries a plate of green eggs. I wouldn’t go as far to say that people (who think that Same Sex relationships are inherently unstable) are ignorant or bigoted, but I suppose they need some form of enlightenment. And that, my dear readers (if any), is the purpose of this next blog.

I just got back 2 days ago from New Orleans, where I met up with a very good (straight, or still straight ) friend (Nina) and attended the Gay Mardi Gras called Southern Decadence (more details about this if I have time to blog it).

Nina and I have not met for several years, and we reminisced a lot about our life in Manila. Amidst all the half naked men, the rainbow flags, the french Donuts, and the smell of liquor on the street — Nina pulled me close to her to and said "I remember our time in Manila, I was the straight one with an unstable relationship, while the rest of you guys (see coronforever.com to see who they are) all had solid and stable ones." I’m paraphrasing of course, but the thought is nevertheless the same.

Fast forward to my arrival back in LA, where 2 straight male friends — in separate conversations — tell me that they think that same-sex relationships are inherently, unavoidably, UNSTABLE. They are gay-friendly, yes, but they think gay-relationships are somehow doomed to be short-term, or at least, with a definite end.

At this point allow us to profile these 3 friends, to understand my arguments better:

(1) Nina has always been around gay and lesbian couples.

(2) Dude-A, was one of the hottest guys in the Manila Gay scene, until he decided to get married to a girl.

(3) Dude-B, is married. Period.

Of course, I should not mention that these friends are all brilliant and openminded (hello? that’s why they are my "friends" hehehe), so we should eliminate bigotry or ignorance as a source of their conclusions.

Let’s deconstruct the Dude-A & B’s opinions now.

(1) Gay relationships are unstable because they are unlikely to have children. A crucial element for the relationship/marriage to last after the passion dies.

- Yes this is true, ONLY IF you are willing to concede that Straight Couples who do not have children (by choice or circumstance) suffer the same fate. So the "instability" of a long term marriage, using this proposition, depends on having a child, and NOT the sexes of the couples.

- Shall we now pull out statistics and percentages of straight married couples/parents  that have ended in divorce? Compare that to same-sex unions. Do the math, and try to spell "INSTABILITY".

(2) Same-sex relationships are unstable because SEX (slash-infidelity) is more rampant.

While it takes a lot of schmoozing, dating, flowers, and other feudal devices and medieval courting practices to get a straight couple in bed together, gay men can simply unzip, bang, and leave. They are simply more prone to relationship disaster.

- Somehow true. But isn’t one side of the straight-couple a "male" as well. And males, straight or gay, being testosterone-driven mammals, are always and everywhere likely to have sex without love/courting. How many straight married men have had mistresses, prostitutes, and casual encounters? 99% I think. 99% have done it, and 1% are lying.

Indeed it is easier for gay men, because both are men and can easily do it in restrooms, theaters, and wherever — heck, you don’t even have to ask his name. But in a world where women are increasingly becoming as sexually open as men, will the gay-sex-advantage even last?

And if same-sex couples are inherently prone to sex because of the testerone driven nature of their bodies, how about lesbian couples? They should be (and many times they are) the most stable of relationships.

Now, try arguing again.

—-

I’m off to work, so I have to cut this short.

In short, then, the 3 people I have mentioned only go to show that no relationship, gay or straight, is not INHERENTLY UNSTABLE. It all depends on your point of view (Dude-B),  your experiences (as in Dude-A, who had very bad experiences with selfish lovers), and your environment/friends/family/exposure (like Nina).

Moreover, a society stressing "same-sex relationships are unstable" is self-fulfilling its own misinformed and cruel assertions, by depriving loving same-sex couples avenues in which to show, concretize, demonstrate, and celebrate their love (i.e. not enough positive gay experiences or personalities shown in media, no legal marriages for gay couples, restricted adoption policies, etc) . With all these negative influences on gay couples (which straight couples don’t have to deal with), do you think it is fair that the spotlight focus on the gay relationships that fail and simply blame it on their INHERENT structure?